Title: Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. | |
Revival_Centres_Discussion_Forums > The Back Room - Come in for SUPPER > The Funny Pages - Jokes, Games, Weirdities, and oddities | Go to subcategory: |
Author | Content |
Kommissar | |
Date Posted:04/08/2007 9:50 AMCopy HTML Conch once asked about basically raiding if we had enough. There was mention on somewhere else on the site about someone being a thug 4 Hollins.The primary group would be the intellectually prepared Ex-GRC members who would gain control of the microphone, podium, have some people prepared to give testimonial re the bullshit the GRC puts you through, and some stuff how your life can be pretty good as well as a mixture of testimonials of success from both religious and non-religious perspectives.The primary group would be backed up by those prepared to physically defend them from Hollins Thugs.We need a legal observer who is not to get involved physically, their job is to document events so when the shit goes down, the dirt is far more on Hollins crew than us.Personal Info about me:Never been a member of GRC. Im an atheist for a while now and really quite content. I am keen on Freedom of & FROM Religion. I live in North Geelong.I found your site researching info on the Potters House with a Google search.I initially registered to find out if any of you knew what went on there. They think they are the true path too. It didn't take long to find out you were a wonderfully diverse bunch.I have also been working hard at adding some a variety of Ex-Christian and questioning Christians to compliment my overwhelminly Atheist Ex-Christian contacts. I have a major hatred of the Reconstructionists/Dominionists and desperately need to meet others without actually going to a worship service, short of the above cunning plan.Ok I wish you all well, except for you Noel, you evil peice of shit.
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #1 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 11:06 AMCopy HTML |
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #2 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 11:39 AMCopy HTML Balls or not, I could not see this working, as Hollins' dynasty is a private corporation and not a public domain. We would straight away, be "shot" for trespassing. Let them wallow in their own slush for now, they will soon have their reward. Enlighten the people through personal witness and maybe a pamphlet run would achieve more. After all, that is how they got to where they are today. An action group needs to be established. Any takers on that one? |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #3 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 11:45 AMCopy HTML $%*'`[Judge Judy]%*'`@
What you are doing is inciting others to commit a criminal offence. I don't doubt your enthusiasm but I would caution anyone from engaging in such activities. The last thing anyone wants is seeing the GRC with a legal avenue to prosecute them Below is a section from the Summary Offences Act I'm not trying to scare anyone but I think any one contemplating such action should be fully aware of the potential consequences. A better solution would be to live well, get on with our lives.
21. Disturbing religious worship S. 21(1) amended by No. 9554 s. 2(2)(Sch. 2 item 315). (1) Any person who wilfully and without lawful justification or excuse, the proof of which lies on him, disquiets or disturbs any meeting of persons lawfully assembled for religious worship or assaults any person lawfully officiating at any such meeting or any of the persons there assembled shall be guilty of an offence. Penalty: 15 penalty units or imprisonment for three months. |
|
dogmafree | Share to: #4 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 2:39 PMCopy HTML Cool! Our own judge Judy! (Good advice there, I'd say).
Hey, are there any other pertinent laws surrounding religious worship that we should know about? Dog. "for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" Shakespeare (Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2)
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #5 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 2:53 PMCopy HTML $%*'`[Judge Judy]%*'`@
Try this one from the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act. People should be careful about what they say here.
8. Religious vilification unlawful (1) A person must not, on the ground of the religious belief or activity of another person or class of persons, engage in conduct that incites hatred against, serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe ridicule of, that other person or class of persons. Note: "engage in conduct" includes use of the internet ore-mail to publish or transmit statements or other material. (2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), conduct? (a) may be constituted by a single occasion or by a number of occasions over a period of time; and (b) may occur in or outside Victoria. |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #6 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 2:55 PMCopy HTML Good advice The GRC has good lawyers |
|
dogmafree | Share to: #7 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 3:04 PMCopy HTML Hmmmmm, intersting!
Sounds to me like we're almost ALL guilty, one way or another. The RCI and RF I have known regularly practiced bashing of folk & organisations of other persuations. This forum is chokkas full of contempt, revulsion and severe ridicule of the revvers. So, does it matter legally, if the contemt is justified? Dog. "for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" Shakespeare (Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2)
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #8 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 3:09 PMCopy HTML $%*'`[Judge Judy]%*'`@
This section from the act should clear it up 9. Motive and dominant ground irrelevant (1) In determining whether a person has contravened section 7 or 8, the person's motive in engaging in any conduct is irrelevant. (2) In determining whether a person has contravened section 7 or 8, it is irrelevant whether or not the race or religious belief or activity of another person or class of persons is the only or dominant ground for the conduct, so long as it is a substantial ground. |
|
dogmafree | Share to: #9 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 3:30 PMCopy HTML Hey there's a thought.........
The Catholic church oughtta sue the pants off the revvers. Guess they could use the cash, coz they been paying out big-time in law suits lately! After all, they have plenty of grounds, with all the printed verbal stuff from the revver's platform over the years. Wouldn't that be interesting? On the other hand, wonder how the moddy here feels about this? Dog. "for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" Shakespeare (Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2)
|
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #10 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 4:14 PMCopy HTML |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #11 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 4:15 PMCopy HTML
From reading this lawful remark, it also points the finger at places like the GRC making judgement on other people and religions so if this is the case it shows the GRC in contempt.
By the way the GRC does not classify itself as a RELIGION |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #12 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 5:06 PMCopy HTML There may be mention of the legal rights of religious groups, but more so the rights of individuals and their right of religious freedom ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.humanrights.gov.au/word/human_rights/religion/article_18_religious_freedom.doc Permissible limitations on religions I believe that people are at their best and at their worst in Religion. We need to recognise that Religious faith is one of the most potent agents for good and for evil in the lives of people. This is clear particularly in the world of cults and New Religious Movements. Not all of them by any means are evil, but the capacity they have for inflicting pain and havoc in people's lives is enormous.155 International law recognises that religion or belief may only be subject to such limitations as are prescribed by law and ?are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others' (ICCPR article 18.3 and Religion Declaration article 1.3).fficeffice" /> The Special Rapporteur on Religion and Belief noted that cult groups in Australia have relative freedom to practise their religion, subject only to the general law protecting the rights and well-being of others. ------------------------------------------------------- In this Report Dr David Millikan made submissions about the treatment of people in these religions (quite interesting reading) If anyone feels that they need to contact someone regarding the cult GRC and affiliates, then Dr Millikan is the person to contact. Take the time to read this article and know where you stand. |
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #13 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 6:28 PMCopy HTML
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #14 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 6:46 PMCopy HTML $%*'`[Judge Judy]%*'`@
Don't shoot the Messenger Brett. I'm merely stating the law as its stands. I didn't make it. I was only responding to a question posed on the forum that had had the real consequence of seeing good people get into trouble for well intentioned acts. If that is a problem fella then build a bridge and get over it. I used to look up to you but your starting to get on my nerves with all your santimonious clap trap. You're almost as full of it as the rest of the god botherers. The fact is the law is the law so deal with it toss bag. |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #15 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 7:53 PMCopy HTML Get over it Miller. |
|
Uncoolman | Share to: #16 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 8:10 PMCopy HTML
Come on guys, this is just playing into the hands of the culties. infighting and bickering doesn't achive anything. Both have a good point of view. (Maybe "Trolls" amongst us too)
|
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #17 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 9:21 PMCopy HTML
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #18 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 9:47 PMCopy HTML Ex drug addicts don't make very good witnesses in court. The question of how ex are they is always there |
|
Glad-to be out | Share to: #19 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 10:52 PMCopy HTML Reply to : Anonymous I am sure that there would be a great number of credible witnesses and this is what has prevented Noel from taking any action in the past and why there will be deafening silence in the future. Cheers, Glad.
"Faith is not about everything turning out OK; Faith is about being OK no matter how things turn out."
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #20 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:04/08/2007 11:34 PMCopy HTML you'd know a fair bit about drugs and horticulture wouldn't you Glad. You'd be another fine character witness. I'm told you were seen coming out of the house. How's your husband going? |
|
Glad-to be out | Share to: #21 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 8:03 AMCopy HTML Reply to : Anonymous I don't suppose that you realise that this is the best period on the Forum for months and your contributions have been the catalyst needed to get things going. Well done. My family are all well, thankyou for enquiring. I hope that yours are in good health too. Life eh!!!!!!!! You can't say that it is dull. The trouble with it is, unless you were there, the information is always tainted, usually by people bearing a grudge. Moth isn't exGRC, but he is a great guy, willing to give advice and who tries to help those who are stuck in / or just leaving any fundamentalist, mind controlling, elitist, thought reforming, man based CULT such as Noel's. People usually change and grow as individuals as the YEARS pass, but you seem to be stuck in some way. I wish you well and hope that the path that you have chosen for your life's journey is not strewn with to many rocks, hills and potholes. Cheers, Glad
you'd know a fair bit about drugs and horticulture wouldn't you Glad.You'd be another fine character witness. I'm told you were seen coming out of the house.How's your husband going?
"Faith is not about everything turning out OK; Faith is about being OK no matter how things turn out."
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #22 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 9:22 AMCopy HTML Glad you say that things are never clear unless you were there. OK hers your chance to clear things up. do you deny that your spouse is a convicted drug trafficker or not Was he or was he not arrested for growing a large dop crop. Did he go to jail come on set things straight. |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #23 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 10:23 AMCopy HTML That Anon is known as a wife basher also, Glad. |
|
Glad-to be out | Share to: #24 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 10:42 AMCopy HTML Reply to : Anonymous Wow, thanks for that piece of information. It is pretty sad really. Usually people grow, mature and become better human beings as different life experiences mold and shape them. Not this guy though. Trapped in an abusive cultish group, with a nature that seems to fit in well with Hollins abusive doctrines. So sad, so many people affected in so many tragic ways by his (Hollins) twisted ministry. Cheers, Glad
"Faith is not about everything turning out OK; Faith is about being OK no matter how things turn out."
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #25 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 10:51 AMCopy HTML Lets consider this. You say that I am a pedophile and wife basher yet you have no idea who I am. So Yeah right. you are spot on the money. Dream on honey If you think you know who I am then name me. I on the other hand know who you are (AW) and can produce a Geelong addy article about your situation i.e I can prove what I say So come on baby put up or shut up |
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #26 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 11:15 AMCopy HTML
I do not understand why a person like Anon has to put down people like that, if he isn't still tied up with the "Cult". This must be the product that is produced during their (cult) rein of abuse over the years and even though some have escaped that prison, they still carry that root bitterness within themselves. We all do the wrong things sometime in our lives and must bear the consequences for our actions. Human frailty exists in each and every one of us, but this is where it should end. This is what the death and resurrection of Christ was all for. He paid a great price so that we are delivered from the condemnation of our fallen nature. The heinous crime is that the actions and accusations of those that should know better, are doing it the name of Jesus. |
|
Glad-to be out | Share to: #27 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 11:18 AMCopy HTML Reply to : Anonymous Anon, I have no intention of running with you on this. My intention here is to expose the GRC for the twisted place that it is. Usually I don't reply to Anon's at all. You should realise that life moves on. Why do you think that you are the way you are? Angry, bitter, hurt, confused, vengeful. You seem hellbent on preventing meaningful dialogue from happening on the Forum and regardless of what you choose to do, this is the last time that I will acknowledge you because the work of exposing Hollins and helping the poor buggars in the GRC is far too important to be sidetracked by you. Cheers, AW Glad s consider this.You say that I am a pedophile and wife basher yet you have no idea whoI am. So Yeah right. you are spot on the money. Dream on honeyIf you think you know who I am then name me.I on the other hand know who you are (AW) and can produce a Geelong addy article about your situation i.e I can prove what I saySo come on baby put up or shut up "Faith is not about everything turning out OK; Faith is about being OK no matter how things turn out."
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #28 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 11:19 AMCopy HTML Did I say you where a pedophile? Go ask God for a life. |
|
Morning Sunshine | Share to: #29 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 12:01 PMCopy HTML Reply to : Glad-to be out
Hi Glad, You are taking and handling this guy's abuse to you extremely well Glad.And I admire you as an ambassador to this forum.Your input here is so helpful to the cause. You seem to just put everything that you say in it's right perspective. YOU ARE JUST GREAT GLAD. Anon can SLUR all he likes. He does not need to make other people's business his business. So Anon go GET A LIFE. M.S. Let"s Fly Away.
|
|
Glad-to be out | Share to: #30 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 1:31 PMCopy HTML Reply to : Morning Sunshine Hi MS, things have certainly become interesting on the ol' Forum. With personal insults there is always a "care factor" involved. I think on this matter mine is zero. Life is far too short to worry about things in the distant past. The only thing that matters is, as I have said before, exposing Hollins and his cronies for what they are. As we all know, Hollins group if you are in it, stunts personal development and if you have left and haven't worked your way through the issues and hang-ups you walked out of the GRC with, cripples you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I firmly believe that everyone who contributes on the Forum, either helps people to develop and grow, or exposes the deepseated hurt that has been inflicted by the GRC. Good to hear from you MS. Hope the weather is better where you are, bit cold here. Cheers, Glad
Hi Glad,You are takin
"Faith is not about everything turning out OK; Faith is about being OK no matter how things turn out."
|
|
Morning Sunshine | Share to: #31 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 4:33 PMCopy HTML Reply to : Glad-to be out
Hi Again Glad, I agree with you too,The Nollins Group, have certainly made an impact on peoples lives,and it does as you say , leave deep, deep scares and deep seated hurt as you have said.I can certainly relate to that. But as time goes on, yes life does change to have a new perspective to life. We do get stronger and learn by experiences every day.Particulary when we are free from the.. G.R.C.."BONDAGE" With all their man made doctrines. And I do like to HELP now, those who are on their way to a better life out side that "CANCEROUS INFECTED BRAINWASHED REGIME." We have just seen a perfect example of an affected cancerous person here today on this thread with "Anonymous's" preformances.Showing no care for some others here who are very caring to others. (Glad and Brett.) Hope "HE" may learn much sooner than later, to treat others the way he would like to be treated and spoken to himself.I guess where there is life there is hope. Our past is our past,and there is no need to justify anything. There is great STRENGTH learning from past experiences and adversity we go through in life to mould us to where we are today.(As Glad has explained also) Wow people TOMORROW is going to be a wonderfull day like today. It is so good to be alive. Love you all. M.S. Let"s Fly Away.
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #32 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:05/08/2007 4:37 PMCopy HTML Who says I am current or ex GRC. You people jump to conclusions too quickly. |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #33 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:06/08/2007 12:20 AMCopy HTML Well if your not a current or ex grc, what are you? Maybe an evil spirit come to haunt us |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #34 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:07/08/2007 2:34 AMCopy HTML From personal experience...
In the eyes of those currently attending, you would simply be 'out of order' ... everything else, right or wrong, truth or lie, would be irrelevant. There are basically three elements in any face-to-face communication: . words . tone of voice and . body language. These three elements account differently for the meaning of the message: - Words account for 7% - Tone of voice accounts for 38% and - Body language accounts for 55% of the message. To the GRC there seeing you, you're body language just being there will betray your goal/intent. To the GRC there hearing you, your tone of voice, will probably come off less than loving. To the GRC there listening to you, you're words will find no soil. Good luck... |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #35 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:07/08/2007 10:40 AMCopy HTML Reply to : Anonymous
I just posted the above msg about communicating to people. Anyhow, just read this one.. rofl rofl.. he just made a statement about jumping to conclusions .. wow.. you surely didn't add any validity to that by your evil spirit response did you ? lol |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #36 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:07/08/2007 1:08 PMCopy HTML Reply to : Anonymous The committment to make a difference is 100% though. It doesn't matter how long it takes, every person who reads this forum retains some of whats said in their memory. Even if they don't agree, they have still read something other than GRC stuff. Its like water running over a rock, it takes years, but it does have an affect.
From personal experience...In the eyes of those currently attending, you would simply be 'out of order' ... everything else, right or wrong, truth or lie, would be irrelevant.There are basically three elements in any face-to-face communication:. words. tone of voice and. body language.These three elements account differently for the meaning of the message:- Words account for 7%- Tone of voice accounts for 38% and- Body language accounts for 55% of the message.To the GRC there seeing you, you're body language just being there will betray your goal/intent.To the GRC there hearing you, your tone of voice, will probably come off less than loving.To the GRC there listening to you, you're words will find no soil.Good luck...
|
|
Anonymous | Share to: #37 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:07/08/2007 6:19 PMCopy HTML A cunning plan? sound more like suicide to me. Good luck taking on the Futch. |
|
The Conch | Share to: #38 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:09/08/2007 12:03 AMCopy HTML No way did I suggest raiding, just the opposite... core group facilitation... strategy... media and lobbying campaign with focussed actions... educational focus on social dangers, etc... group support and legal testimonies... networking with world's foremost mind control experts.. etc
Another thing: anon trolls with negative comments and personal vitriol and ill will should not be responded to, they should be ignored. Why argue when there is no argument? There are so many dawns
That have not yet broken
|
|
Kommissar | Share to: #39 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:09/08/2007 10:31 AMCopy HTML Conch your clarification is noted. I have a certain way of looking at things that comes into play when things are in fact ambiguous but I fill in the gaps without realising it to mean someting In regards to the legal "clarification", this confuses things. My proposed strategy is about challenging Noels Legitimacy. Not Christianity (ie a religeon). Motive is critical to almost any offence. Guilty act, Guilty mind. Both must be proven to be guilty of the offence. He bags members and ex-members, we would just be just bagging Noel and saying to the congregation they dont have to put up with it. One Legal reality that Judge Judy does not even try to warn us off, that incidentally should give us all pause for caution, is the matter of the interpretation of the law is up to the presiding member of the judiciary and GRC has VERY good lawyers. Personally I am now in favour of regular demonstrations outside their church, with leaflets offered to those that enter. Signs advertising this website address and any face to face support groups. Obviously Conch is more experienced let alone level headed than me. The legal position may well be shakey as regards to a "raid", but a demonstration that does not actually block access to the site is pretty safe legally. Now in regards to the minor flame wars that have happened, I have very very sorry for my part in this. I am aware that Noel & his spies frequent this site. I think it is important to remember this sure, but fundamentally assess the idea, rather than attack the person as a potential spy. Must go now. Peace to all except you know whooooo! |
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #40 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:14/08/2007 5:23 PMCopy HTML Arrrhh yes the FUTCH..married to my cousin,we had WORDS just before I left place and all because he was in a bad mood.But really yes I know all about his past and hey I even work with most of his old mates every day but if he is a born again christian surely violence shouldnt even come into the picture,yep he's covered in prison tatts...ewwwwhhh scary and he has a naked women tattoo on his arm...ewwwwwhhh pornographic NOT..like I said I was raised in the GRC and now I work every day along side men that make him look like a baby lamb,his past should have nothing to do with anything and it sounds to me ANON (YAWN) that you are threatening violence,that's it hide behide the scary looking man with all those WORLDLY tattoos,he's going to heaven too but at least he can punch the crap out of anyone that dares to step onto the holy ground of the GRC without permission...yeah really really christian attitude right there. |
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #41 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:14/08/2007 5:23 PMCopy HTML Arrrhh yes the FUTCH..married to my cousin,we had WORDS just before I left place and all because he was in a bad mood.But really yes I know all about his past and hey I even work with most of his old mates every day but if he is a born again christian surely violence shouldnt even come into the picture,yep he's covered in prison tatts...ewwwwhhh scary and he has a naked women tattoo on his arm...ewwwwwhhh pornographic NOT..like I said I was raised in the GRC and now I work every day along side men that make him look like a baby lamb,his past should have nothing to do with anything and it sounds to me ANON (YAWN) that you are threatening violence,that's it hide behide the scary looking man with all those WORLDLY tattoos,he's going to heaven too but at least he can punch the crap out of anyone that dares to step onto the holy ground of the GRC without permission...yeah really really christian attitude right there. |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #42 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:17/08/2007 11:33 AMCopy HTML Lemons do you have a prison nickname like the freak or vinegar tits. I think we should hold a contest to find one for you. I'll start Fatguts Thunder thighs Slag guts The child abandoner The Gimp She who lived in her sisterinlaws shadow for all those years The Swamp thing No Crying, loving or leaving now honey child. Stay the course and fight back |
|
Anonymous | Share to: #43 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:17/08/2007 5:21 PMCopy HTML $%*'`[jonah]%*'`@
|
|
The Conch | Share to: #44 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:19/08/2007 6:27 AMCopy HTML The previous two posts are pathetic, childish demonstrations of shit for brains. Hopefully they are not really like this as people because their posts demonstrate minds more animal than human.
No comparison with the fineness of mind and the caring, mature, admirable, empathetic and spiritual qualities of Glad. Don't even bother responding Glad, they are a mile below you in the holy order of things... not worth even your contempt.... they are behaving like dung beetles. In any better moments surely they must feel ashamed. There are so many dawns
That have not yet broken
|
|
The Conch | Share to: #45 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:19/08/2007 7:16 AMCopy HTML Sorry, peoples for assuming these last two attacks were on Glad.
Although I don't know Lemons as well what I said still holds, particularly about the dung beetles still holds. Predictably sad that the most vitriolic, personal, childish and pathetic attacks are particularly directed at stronger women. Freudians have a field day with misogynysts.... abandonment issues... deficient mothers... disfunctional families... lost souls unloved and insecure clutching.... There are so many dawns
That have not yet broken
|
|
Ex_Member | Share to: #46 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:19/08/2007 7:53 AMCopy HTML Why can't people write more constructive postings on this forum, instead of just putting those down that are trying? |
|
Glad-to be out | Share to: #47 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:19/08/2007 8:23 AMCopy HTML Reply to : OTR and The Conch There is only one reason why they post personal insults etc., to interupt the flow of dialogue on the Forum. Unfortunately it works. Cheers, Glad Conchie, you are a gem!!
Reply to : The ConchSorry, peoples for assuming these last two attacks were on Glad.Although I don't know Lemons as well what I said still holds, particularly about the dung beetles still holds.Predictably sad that the most vitriolic, personal, childish and pathetic attacks are particularly directed at stronger women. Freudians have a field day with misogynysts.... abandonment issues... deficient mothers... disfunctional families... lost souls unloved and insecure clutching....Why can't peoplewrite more constructive postings on this forum, instead of just putting those down that are trying?
"Faith is not about everything turning out OK; Faith is about being OK no matter how things turn out."
|
|
motmot | Share to: #48 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:19/08/2007 9:57 PMCopy HTML
Don't even bother responding Glad, they are a mile below you in the holy order of things... not worth even your contempt.... they are behaving like dung beetles.......................... To the contrary , I know it shows them up for just what they are . It proves our point as to what vomit exudes from the walls of the GRC Pty. Ltd. which is generated by Noel Hollins preaching ... ie. that everyone else is scum - only they are right ...... that they are the " Centre of the World " ! As much as we don't like the vial evil they post , we know them by their works and can see passed ...... " the name- calling " . The more they say , the deeper they bury themselves . " Those are my principles and if you don"t like them, I do have others"
Come-On !
always tell the truth
motmot
|
|
Allah | Share to: #49 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:19/08/2007 10:03 PMCopy HTML
You piece of shit. swallow your own dung. lemons has the heart to call it the way it is. |
|
Kommissar | Share to: #50 |
Re:Hollins Legal Position? A cunning plan. & an Intro from me. Date Posted:25/08/2007 9:09 PMCopy HTML 9. Motive and dominant ground irrelevant (1) In determining whether a person has contravened section 7 or 8, the person's motive in engaging in any conduct is irrelevant. (2) In determining whether a person has contravened section 7 or 8, it is irrelevant whether or not the race or religious belief or activity of another person or class of persons is the only or dominant ground for the conduct, so long as it is a substantial ground.
It is abundantly clear, that religion is not the issue, not even a substantial ground. At Issue is the behaviour of NHH. Nothing more. Right from the word go, my proposal involves speakers from a christian perspective as well as non-christian perspective. Can anyone explain how someone that proves in court : a) that maintains broadly christian views, b) makes no issue of Christianity in relation to the meeting. could in anyway be construed as being in breach of paragraph 9(2)? Thus they should be safe from these provisions of the ACT. Dodgy Judges notwithstanding. Considering that Judiciary around the world, including victoria have not been shy of finding Exorcists guilty of murder, I really doubt Christian ex-GRCers would have a problem. Myself as an Athiest might have a harder time of it. But again, since I have not gone to any christian churches and had a go, I should probably be safe too. What Judge Judy seems to be doing is a naked attempt at intimidation, not information. Research SLAAP and internet takedown notices etc and you will find this is a common lawyers tactic. Notice they have branded our actions as being in breach while being extremely non-specific about how we would be breaching the law. OH yeah, and if GRC is Pty Ltd, doesn't that kind of hurt NHH legal position in regards to the abovementioned legislation. Kind of hard to say its religion when its a private company aint it. Just how does an organisation prove it is a Religion anyway. Love to all except you know who.... |