User Name  Password
Title: 616 Number of the Beast
Hop to: 
Views:35     
<<Previous ThreadNext Thread>>
Page 1 / 1    
AuthorComment
prophetlady
 Author    



Rank:Lurker

Score: 140
Posts: 4
Registered: 11/01/2009

(Date Posted:31/08/2009 11:13:36)

616 ("six hundred and sixteen", or "six hundred sixteen" in American English) is believed by some Christians to have been the original Number of the Beast in the Book of Revelation in the Christian Bible. Different early versions of the Book of Revelation gave different numbers, and 666 had been widely accepted as the original number. In 2005, however, a fragment of papyrus 115 was revealed, containing the earliest known version of that part of the Book of Revelation discussing the Number of the Beast. It gave the number as 616, suggesting that this may have been the original.
(number)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/616

May 2005, it was reported that scholars at Oxford University using advanced imaging techniques[15] had been able to read previously illegible portions of the earliest known record of the Book of Revelation(a 1,700 year old papyrus), from the Oxyrhynchus site, Papyrus 115 or P115, dating one century after Irenaeus. The fragment gives the Number of the Beast as 616 (chi, iota, stigma), rather than the majority text 666 (chi, xi, stigma).[1] The other early witness Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C) has it written in full: hexakosiai deka hex (lit. six hundred sixteen).[16]

ikihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_beastpedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_beast

JOSEPH=6

XVI=16

=

616 THE BEAST

--------------------------------------------------------------
http://thewitness.yuku.com

newsblaze writer

Didaktikon
1# 



Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007

Reply To prophetlady
(Date Posted:31/08/2009 18:18:12)

Fairygirl,

I know a thing or two about NT textual criticism myself, consequently, I know a thing or two about the relative worth of the various papyri. It takes more than simply the one early fragment to overturn the vast documentary evidence that presents '666' as being the original reading of Revelation 13:18. Furthermore, I don't think we should discount the testimony of Church Fathers, from across the Greco-Roman Empire, to this effect.

Conspiracy theories they come, and conspiracy theories they go.

Blessings,

Ian

--------------------------------------------------------------
Vivos voco, mortuos plango

website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com

<<Previous ThreadNext Thread>>
Page 1 / 1    


Pleaseconsider

Copyright © 2000-2009 Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.