User Name  Password
Title: Mr and Mrs Pillnut - Acts 10 and Tongues
Hop to: 
Views:183     
<<Previous ThreadNext Thread>>
Page 1 / 1    
AuthorComment
Te Luo Yi
 Author    



Rank:Poster Venti III

Score: 11710
Posts: 473
Registered: 25/04/2005

(Date Posted:24/10/2005 13:31:43)

BrettYou wrote:IN ACTS 10, WHEN PETER SAW CORNELIUS AND HIS FRIENDS RECIVE THE SPIRIT IN FRONT OF HIM, WHAT DID HE SEE THAT TOTALLY CONVINCED HIM THAT THERE WAS NO DOUBT THEY HAD RECEIVED? DID HE SEE THEIR "LOVE", OR "PEACE" OR "MEEKNESS"? HE SAW AND HEARD TONGUES.I draw your attention to another aticle by Ian Thomason:Gentiles and GraceAn exposition of Acts chapter 10By Ian Thomasonhttp://www.pleaseconsider.info/articles/acts/acts10.htmPerhaps you could read this and then voice your objections.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Wanna know why I do not believe in Jesus anymore?

http://whyidontbelieve.blogspot.com

Te Luo Yi
1# 



Rank:Poster Venti III

Score:11710
Posts:473
Registered:25/04/2005


(Date Posted:28/10/2005 07:34:52)

Tongues - Why they cannot be the definitive sign

An examination of tongues as the ultimate sign.....warts and all

 By Drew Dixon

The following article touches on the core issue of Revivalist doctrine, that is, the unchallenged assumption that 'tongues' are the ultimate sign and confirmation of someone being 'filled with the Holy Spirit'. Not only do I challenge that assumption, but I shall also develop my argument to show why we simply cannot not look to tongues as the 'sign'. 

Some of what I shall write may be considered by some to be a little 'irreligious' but it should not be taken that way. It is simply an open account of the things that took place. I would also remind those reading this article that I still maintain the legitimacy of tongues as one of the gifts in our current day and age, perhaps just not as widespread as I once would have thought.

http://pleaseconsider.info/articles/holy_spirit_gifts/tongues_not_sign.html

--------------------------------------------------------------
Wanna know why I do not believe in Jesus anymore?

http://whyidontbelieve.blogspot.com

Anonymous
2# 



Registered:06/04/2001


(Date Posted:22/11/2005 05:09:33)

Hi Brett,
 
Christ taught (Luke 11 verses 9 to 13) that in order to receive the Holy Sprit we must specifically pray, ask to receive it. We must seek to receive it.
 
Two things: (1) Luke 11:9-13 is a parable about God's faithfulness, using the language of everyday human need. At the conclusion of the parable comes the "punch-line": God (the Father) understands our daily needs and our deeper needs. He would, therefore, give the Holy Spirit to those who asked (and not sought) of him. (2) The Holy Spirit is a "who" and not an "it". You still seem to follow the RCI/GRC/CAI's Holy Spirit = "spiritual electricity" line. That's bad. 
 
In obedience to this teaching of Christ we encourage new members to pray and seek to be filled with the Spirit.
 
Nowhere in the entire NT do we find "new members" seeking to be filled with the Spirit after the fashion you teach. We do, however, find Christians (who by definition possess and are possessed by God's Spirit) seeking to continue to be filled as an ongoing reality. But I've digressed. The only obedience Scripture teaches that is required for salvation, is to believe the gospel about Christ. That's it.
 
Based on Acts 2 ,10, 19 and the strong inference of Acts 8, we tell them to expect to speak in a new LANGUAGE ( not stammering, or repeated syllables) when they finally receive the Spirit thru seeking and asking.
 
Your understanding of Acts 2, 10, 8 and 19 is wrong. What you teach people is to strive to secure their own salvation; rather than resting in God's faithfulness. What you teach is the heresy of Pelagianism.
 
There is no time limit given to people for this seeking or praying. We encourage seekers to keep seeking for it for as long as it takes.
 
Again, "it"?
 
As long as people are indicating that they are seeking and praying for the Spirit there is no limit of weeks, months or years. If people who have been seeking are not receiving and for whatever reason give up and stop their asking, they are the ones that leave .
 
Well here's the rub: according to you, God is a liar. Go back to Luke 11:13 and read it again. Humans keeping their sides of the "bargain" by asking, but God defaulting on his? I don't think so.
 
We've found that we don't need to "drive them out" or something like that, they don't want to remain with us.
 
I'm not surprised. The frustration, disappointment and feeling of condemnation must be unbearable!
 
In our experience here no one who continued seeking to receive took longer than one year. We feel it would be very foolish and wrong to drive people out of the church if they are still seeking and praying to receive the Spirit.
 
So God believes in "testing" people to see if they're serious, huh? How does this fit your conception of grace?
 
The time that it takes for all who seek varies from person to person.
 
Of course it does, as you've summed up so well: it depends on the person, rather than on on God!
 
That's how we manage the process of people seeking and praying for the Holy Spirit. Is it cultic?
 
Cultic? Possibly. Heretical? Definitely.
 
We believe that the whole process can be managed with grace, patience and kindness.
 
The Bible, brother, doesn't teach becoming saved to be a process. It teaches it to be a gracious action of God, who stoops to lift the sinner out of his or her sin.
 
I totally disagree with any "methods" being used to kind of "induce" speaking new words in a new language.
 
And yet your methods reinforce precisely this practice.
 
I'm sorry, Brett, but your gospel isn't the Christian gospel. You teach a human-dependent workds-based form of (self) "righteousness". Now MrJonah might be fixated about the cultic aspects of what results from what you teach, but to me, the most important consideration relates to the teaching itself. What you have presented here is heresy.
 
Ian
 
 
(addendum - this is posted here due to the overcluttering of the other threads by other well meaning posters... Can we please keep this thread strictly just between Mr Jonah, Rev Ian Thomason and the Pilinuts ONLY... that's all
 
Thanks everyone for your understanding
 
Friend of Rev Ian )
 
<<Previous ThreadNext Thread>>
Page 1 / 1    


Pleaseconsider

Copyright © 2000-2009 Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.