|
Didaktikon
|
51#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To Guest
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 00:51:35)
Hiya, Brendan.
Spoken like a true Revivalist! But fear not, bloke, for I am right. Consequently, you should probably stop and think about the ramifications of this for a moment, after all where does that leave you? 
Hoo, roo.
Ian
P.S. WRT your comment/question about me creating a church of my own, so as to feed my arrogance and pride, well you clearly have me confused with others. My surname is Thomason. It's not Longfield, Hollins or Kuhlmann
(Message edited by Didaktikon On 20/10/2008 17:12:47)
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 01:31:10)
Intreresting that this chapter 14 of first Corinthians (which deals with the whole tongues thing in godly and orderly manner and the proper handling of it all for a positive outcome) says in verse 38 "if any man prefers to stay ignorant let him be ignored" Whats' upset you more ? the fact that you THOUGHT you knew, or the fact that someone else might have a better 'handle' on these things than you ? You see Ian, the whole thing needs to fit or none of it will  Every person who gets' saved receives the gift of holy spirit (God is Holy and God is Spirit) and can only give what He is, holy spirit. With that ONE gift comes the ability, enablement, to operate the NINE manifestations of the ONE gift The only reason ALL who are saved do not operate tongues is many have not been properly shown how. EVERYONE in this church in Carrum Downs has been fully instructed and is able to s.i.t AND interpret their tongues AND prophesy when called upon I listened Ian, they were messages from or for God for that group of believers present. There was none of this personal prophesying rubbish that is often used manipulatively in some churches, it was all straight 'forth telling' As the pastor said to me, God is big enough to tell you something first, He doesn't need to tell someone to tell you ! (another breath of...fresh air !) Unlike Bono, I've found what I'm looking for, hope you do too
|
|
MothandRust
|
53#
|
Rank:Ghost in the machine

Score:34610
Posts:1585
Registered:27/02/2004
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 03:41:18)
"Those who cannot remember the past are destined to repeat it"
Remember being sweet talked into Revivalism?
In the very least, such a duping should serve as a healthy learning experience.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Be nice, for everyone that you meet is fighting a harder battle - Anita Roddick
|
|
Didaktikon
|
54#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To Guest
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 04:51:44)
Hiya, Phil.
Intreresting that this chapter 14 of first Corinthians (which deals with the whole tongues thing in godly and orderly manner and the proper handling of it all for a positive outcome) says in verse 38 "if any man prefers to stay ignorant let him be ignored" Whats' upset you more ? the fact that you THOUGHT you knew, or the fact that someone else might have a better 'handle' on these things than you ?
If you honestly and sincerely believe such to be the case, then please, go on believing so 
You see Ian, the whole thing needs to fit or none of it will. Every person who gets' saved receives the gift of holy spirit (God is Holy and God is Spirit) and can only give what He is, holy spirit. With that ONE gift comes the ability, enablement, to operate the NINE manifestations of the ONE gift. The only reason ALL who are saved do not operate tongues is many have not been properly shown how.
Okay. If "pastor" says so 
EVERYONE in this church in Carrum Downs has been fully instructed and is able to s.i.t AND interpret their tongues AND prophesy when called upon.
All 40 of them?! But seriously, I don't doubt this for one moment  I listened Ian, they were messages from or for God for that group of believers present. There was none of this personal prophesying rubbish that is often used manipulatively in some churches, it was all straight 'forth telling.
I thought so. The "interpretations" of the "tongues" were messages from God, huh? And in spite of this you don't see why that should give you "cause" to "pause"? Finally, before you go dismissing outright the possibility that prophecy can be directed towards the needs of an individual, you may care to refresh your memory regarding ol' Agabus and Paul. I think it's somewhere in the 21st chapter of Acts, from memory
As the pastor said to me, God is big enough to tell you something first, He doesn't need to tell someone to tell you ! (another breath of...fresh air !)
I do wonder why he left us the Bible then? And why he gave us the spiritual gift of teacher?
Unlike Bono, I've found what I'm looking for, hope you do too.
I have 
Well, Phil, don't say that you weren't given plenty of warning! I leave you to your fate 
Hoo, roo.
Ian
(Message edited by Didaktikon On 20/10/2008 05:20:20)
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
|
Sea Urchin
|
55#
|
Rank:Poster Venti III

Score:9010
Posts:431
Registered:15/02/2007
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 04:56:19)
Hello Phil
The gifts listed in 1Cor 12:4-6 are known as the Charismatic gifts and verse 7 identifies them as Manifestations that are available to all in the Body of Christ without exception and at the will of the Spirit. The Spirit chooses one or another to exhibit a particular gift for the profit of all e.g. one may be given a gift of prophecy in order to communicate God's will and love to a local congregation. These gifts are understood to be manifestations given at the time of need for the purpose at hand. Every individual if open and willing to be used by the Spirit will eventually be used at the discretion of the Spirit.
Then there are the gifts listed in Ephesians 4:11 - individuals are called to take on administrative positions or roles eg apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors & teachers within the body of Christ for the edification of all.
The gifts in Romans 12:1-4 are more operational in their application - they are given to everyone in one degree or another, everyone being able to teach, serve etc in various capacities and with varied effectiveness according to the measure attributed to each individual. God, being 'no respecter of person' metes out the 7 gifts to all individuals so that everyone can function equally serving one another for the benefit of all.
That is my understanding of the three 'categories' of the gifts.
I'd be interested in hearing the scriptures for the 12 reasons for (and benefits of) speaking in tongues (I thought the purpose was to edify oneself). Also you seem to be saying that "speaking in tongues is the foundational manifestation" of all the other gifts? So one cannot operate in any of the gifts without speaking in tongues first?
Whilst I love your enthusiasm Phil, everything that we say (and do) needs to be backed up by scripture (in context of course).
Urch
|
|
Didaktikon
|
56#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To Sea%20Urchin
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 05:03:41)
Hi, Urch.
That is my understanding of the three 'categories' of the gifts.
And whilst I love your enthusiasm too, you've missed the "side of the barn" by the proverbial "mile" with that lot!
Blessings,
Ian
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
|
Uncoolman
|
57#
|
Rank:Regular Rookier

Score:5550
Posts:156
Registered:05/04/2003
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 06:27:18)
I would like to welcome
new users to the forum who are making their journey out of the Revival
organisation, we enjoy hearing from you. It's our pleasure to make
this forum available to you so that you may interact with the panel
invited here to field your queries.
To properly distinguish one
person from the other and to aid discussion, we ask
that you please join the forum rather than using the blanket name of "guest". You can certainly remain anonymous, and you may also make use of the many
functions available to 'normal' forum members.
Thank you for visiting and we hope you'll stay for a chat.
Moddy
(Message edited by Uncoolman On 20/10/2008 06:32:42)
|
|
Talmid
|
58#
|
Rank:Regular Member

Score:4190
Posts:205
Registered:21/04/2008
|
A note for Phil
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 18:39:13)
Oh Phil,
Don't you recall how you were sold on the demonstrably false notion that considering the grammatical gender of koine Greek supports arguments "trinitarianism"? Doesn't that say *something* about problems with Mr Carrum Down's teaching and understanding of the bible, and doesn't it send up a red flag regarding your own discernment of that teaching and understanding of the bible?
Wouldn't it be wise to find a competent teacher of orthodoxy and allow him/her to present that case so you have something other than 5 years of Revivalism to compare with this oneness pentecostalism you're currently talking about?
BTW Have you asked them whether a baptism using the words/idea "in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit" is valid? My bet is that you'll be told it's not valid.
-------------------------------------------------------------- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
Talmid
|
59#
|
Rank:Regular Member

Score:4190
Posts:205
Registered:21/04/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 18:42:09)
Phil,
Can't edit so ... please replace "supports arguments trinitarianism" with "supports argments *against* trinitarianism"
-------------------------------------------------------------- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
Didaktikon
|
60#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To Talmid
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 18:52:58)
Talmid, shalom aleichem.
It's probably best that you save your time, and your keystrokes. Phil clearly lacks "...eye's with which to see, and ears with which to hear" (although his obviously have been "tickled by others", of late). Anyway, he's be adequately warned; and in spite of a complete absence of any sort of biblical warrant for his new views, he seems quite determined to follow his current course.
His problem now 
Blessings,
Ian
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
|
tommo
|
61#
|
Rank:Member IV

Score:1500
Posts:75
Registered:05/10/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:20/10/2008 22:56:36)
Brendan, are you a current revivalist or have you moved on?
|
|
ClearVision
|
62#
|
Rank:Lurking

Score:40
Posts:2
Registered:20/10/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:21/10/2008 00:09:08)
To Dear Ian,
For what it’s worth, thought it timely to put some thoughts down for you to “please consider”:)
Firstly, in response to "there are none so blind as those who refuse to see", well this is as applicable to you as it is anyone else. I encourage you to bare this in mind as you blindly continue to refuse to see the rest of what I have to say.
So you know the scriptures back to front from a man’s point of view but what about from the Lord’s point of view – without the discernment of the Spirit you CANNOT understand His Word and it’s purpose. Furthermore you are missing the point - the Lord is more than scripture! His plan goes far and beyond what was recorded and written down in words. If you had the Spirit you would know and understand this and would not hold yourself in such high regard. You proclaim to be an expert on the interpretation of different languages like the Greek and the Hebrew? – well here’s one for you; “fool” - it’s English and describes you perfectly, look it up....!
In response to your retort to the question put to you: Do you speak in tongues? ... “given that "tongues" is such an insignificant issue with respect to my personal spirituality, the answer is largely moot!” What has your personal spirituality got to do with salvation? We were all born with the ability to hone into our own ‘spirituality’. The Holy Spirit on the other hand (I can only assume this is what you are loosely referring to) dwells inside us and guides us – the Holy Spirit is given to us and therefore is not actually a part of what makes up our personal spirituality or inner awareness.
Well, do you speak in tongues... yes or no? Whether or not you were once a Revivalist has nothing to do with this! I would have thought someone of your supposed learned abilities would be able to answer a simple yes or no question. Whilst tongues is not the be-all and end-all, consider tongues as proof/ evidence of the Holy Spirit – it’s just one part of the complete package if you will. You impudently use the evidence of scripture to prove your point of view at any given time.... yet you and others are happy to proclaim your salvation to the world without any evidence or proof received from God that you have actually been granted it? Come now....:( And no, this is not what I know to be true based on what I was spoon-fed in RCI. Reading the scriptures independent from any organisation or individual, I cannot deny the context with which tongues is referred to in the bible, neither can I deny the gift of tongues that I have received and my ability to communicate with the Lord in both tongues and in English. Without the Lord providing me with the gift of tongues, how would I know that which I have received? I say again, tongues is not the be-all and end-all, nor should it be regarded as more important than the other manifestations of the Spirit. The way I see it, someone may say they speak in tongues therefore they are saved (broadly RCIs mentality), however unless they demonstrate all of the fruits of the Spirit in their daily walk, they fall short – tongues alone does not guarantee salvation.
Ian, you’re a hypocrite, pure and simple – no better than the revival leaders you condemn. Before I left RCI I knew SL fairly well (was never in his inner circle though, thank goodness) and over the years his arrogance became quite apparent to me, especially during the last couple of phone conversations I had with him – it was sad. By comparison, you and SL are much more alike than you would like to admit – both caught up in you’re status as human beings and the title that has been bestowed to you as custodians of the scriptures. My 8 year old daughter has a better understanding of Christ than you could ever hope to gain through your knowledge of the scriptures, and do you know why? It’s because she sees the Lord’s will and her relationship with her God through the eyes of a child....isn’t that (scripturally) the way we are instructed to read and implement His Word? (Refer Mark 10:14&15 and Matthew 18:1-6). So it is you who needs to take a good long look at yourself – take your learned ‘literary professor’ hat off and put on the hat of a child. The Lord is returning for the meek and the humble... not the person who claims to know more of the scriptures than everyone else. Besides, knowing the scriptures is one thing putting them into practice is another – you clearly don’t have a grasp on either.
Many innocent people enter this website searching for answers. You have simply taken advantage of their vulnerability and have preyed on them – it doesn’t take a genius (or a university lecturer?) to see the irony in this. I have been reading much of what you (and those who support you) have posted on this site for some time now, however until now I have been able to walk away shaking my head and dismissing much of the dribble as nothing but verbal diarrhoea. Well my conscience has finally gotten the better of me and I now feel compelled to speak up for many of those out there who, like me, have just stood back with amusement. This is what I know to be fact - you are no more than a person who pervades the domain of intellectual speculation and diffuses himself through the channels of moral activity. As such, you are causing more damage to those who seek your advice than they ever could have received from attending any revival church – and that’s saying something given the hurt and damage that I have personally experienced and have witnessed from those who either left or have been put out of RCI. Your arrogance and foolishness beggars belief and you are as much an antichrist as the Pope himself. Still blind and refusing to see....?
You say you are not a Longfield to warrant not setting up your own church, but in fact this forum is your own way of holding such a position. You cowardly hide behind a flimsy facade as you preach false doctrine to those who logon to this website. By not even taking on the responsibility of having a personal face to face relationship with those in your cyber-flock you demonstrate a lack of accountability for what you say and do.
Finally, have a read through 2 Timothy 2:14 through to chapter 3:9 and tell us, no more importantly try to convince yourself, how this does not apply to you. Read it, read it again and if having read it a third time you are not pricked in your heart to change your behaviour, then there sadly is very little hope for you – and no, not even the “Lord’s grace” will save you from yourself.
Regards,
CV
|
|
Talmid
|
63#
|
Rank:Regular Member

Score:4190
Posts:205
Registered:21/04/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:21/10/2008 01:32:07)
Hi CV
As someone who has been helped by God through Ian ... Wow what a rant ...
Might I point out that Mk 10:13-16 and Mt 18.1-6 are talking about an attitude of humility, not the degree to which we bring our minds to the task of worshipping God. Scripture clearly encourages us to be both wise and mature, not childish.
Oh ... and might I suggest you think on the implications of Jude's epistle. Eg, where does one discover "the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints" (ESV)?
-------------------------------------------------------------- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
Didaktikon
|
64#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To ClearVision
(Date Posted:21/10/2008 02:18:59)
Hiya, Queer Vision.
Wow! After reading that rather long-winded rant, I've come to one of two possible conclusions: either you've just had a meal of raw snake tonight, and it didn't sit well with you; or you've gone off the "meds" and are now suffering the deleterious effects 
Either way, bud, I think you've quite a bit of soul-searching ahead of you. And while you're playing in that space, try flipping open Scripture. It'll blow your mind 
Now, all jokes aside: but (and it's a rather significant "but") if you're as "in" to accountability as you've claimed, then would you be willing to have your pet theories 'tried' against the objective 'judge' that is God's Word written? We can dance around the mulberry bush 'till all the cows die from boredom with the subjective "scooby-doobie-doo, yakkata yakkata" stuff; at the end of the day we do have the "Book" to test all things, doctrines, quaint little theories, et cetera against. Care to put your credibility on the line? I AM! (I just had to get that in, somewhere) 
Blessings youwards,
Ian
(Message edited by Didaktikon On 21/10/2008 03:08:02)
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
|
Aimoo Team
|
|
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:21/10/2008 03:02:12)
This message has been deleted due to Termination of Account.
|
|
Didaktikon
|
66#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To ClearVision
(Date Posted:21/10/2008 16:41:29)
Good morning, "CV".
Given that it's proven to be something of a slow morning thus far, I thought I'd respond, off-hand, to certain of your concerns, expressed both here and on the "Chat Box".
I suppose it best to begin with a few comments relating to accountability, given that you made the rather silly claim that I stand aloof from any and all forms of such. In stating as much, perhaps you were giving evidence of ignorance concerning what Scripture teaches on the subject? If so, then understand that according to Holy Writ, I shall be held accountable to God, and by him, for each and every word that I utter during this life. One can't appeal to a "higher Court", I hope you would agree? Second, I'm accountable to the owner and moderator of this site, at whose discretion I continue to provide my input. You see I was personally invited to contribute here (were you, by the way?); the moderator being concerned that there was far too great an anti-Christian influence, and not very much of an intelligent Christian voice getting an airing. Third, I'm actually accountable to each and every person who goes to the trouble of tapping away at his or her keyboard, here. Anyone can challenge what I offer, anyone can attempt to rebuke or rebut my views. If what I post is "twaddle", then all such a one has to do is conclusively demonstrate "where" and "why"
So much for accountability.
Next, I'd like to address your particularly silly claim that I somehow over-rely on Scripture. Well, I'm proudly biblical in my beliefs, "biblical" being an adjective that describes an approach that is strictly in accordance with what we find revealed in Scripture. And in following such a direction I stand comfortably within the teachings of Jesus, and within the received tradition of the apostles. After all, wasn't it Paul who stated, "All Scripture is breathed out by God, and is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work"? (2 Timothy 3:16, 17). Did you happen to notice those "trigger" words that I bolded for your edification? Second, you claimed that one must be somehow "spiritual" in order to understand what Scripture teaches, by which of course, you clearly meant a "tongues-speaker". Blah! I disagree. God chose to inscripturate his Word in human languages, mediated as it was through specific human cultures, and then at certain points in human history. Consider, if I were to say to you, "stand on a chair!", you would know exactly what was required of you, even if you didn't fully understand why you were being directed to do so. So too is the case with Scripture. And we can research the structures and meaning contained within the various biblical languages. We can research the particular cultures, their contexts, and the historical situations in which biblical revelation occurred. Scripture, then, is "perspicuous". However, a "fuller" level of understanding requires that a person is actually predisposed towards doing what Scripture directs. And, funily enough, I just happen to be such a person 
Moving on, you've claimed that I'm arrogant. Perhaps. Or perhaps it's simply the case that I'm remarkably confident (even comfortable) in my understanding and knowledge of the subject matter. But even if I am arrogant, so what? Would my purported arrogance change the truth of what I present? Wouldn't such continue to be be true anyway? Bloke, given my very extensive history in dealing with thoroughly obtuse, ignorant and arrogant Revivalists, I tend not to "pussy-foot" around issues of considerable import. To the contrary, in fact, I prefer to get right to the point and often in such a way that is calculated to make a significant impact! And for the record my methods work, bro', they've borne fruit in the lives of hundreds of former Revivalists. But the obnoxious? Well, they simply continue being obnoxious, and I have no particular interest in them But those who are seeking answers, they generally find them rather quickly.
Finally, you've claimed that I'm a hypocrite. Well, that is quite a charge, fella, and yet you've not provided a single shred of evidence to support your claim, nothing whatsoever that suggests that I don't "practice what I preach". So much for that claim. You also stated that I present "false teaching". Based on what, exactly? Would it be your wide-ranging, comprehensive and detailed knowledge of Scripture and theology?! Yeah ... okay. Give it a rest, as you wouldn't recognise "sound doctrine" were I to smack you between the eyes with an open Bible! All that you have to appeal to, the only thing that you can appeal to, is your inherited and uncritically ingested Revivalist nonsense. Sadly, though, you present as being too thick even to realise as much 
In summary, yours isn't a "clear vision", my friend, simply an altogether "queer vision".
Comprende?
Ian
(Message edited by Didaktikon On 21/10/2008 17:49:58)
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
outaegypt
|
67#
|
Rank:Poster Venti I

Score:6410
Posts:304
Registered:22/06/2006
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:21/10/2008 20:35:16)
Reply To ClearVision Quote: If you had the Spirit you would know and understand this and would not hold yourself in such high regard. You proclaim to be an expert on the interpretation of different languages like the Greek and the Hebrew? – well here’s one for you; “fool” - it’s English and describes you perfectly, look it up....!
Matthew 5:22 But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire.
-------------------------------------------------------------- As I hear it, I'll repeat it,
Its up to you if you believe it!
Allegation big and small,
soon revealed before us all.
outa here- Outa Egypt!
|
|
ClearVision
|
68#
|
Rank:Lurking

Score:40
Posts:2
Registered:20/10/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:21/10/2008 23:57:40)
Wow. So much to add yet so little further time I am willing to waste. Hmmm, should I waste my breath? Maybe one last time for good measure. I will part ways by saying a few final things.... again, for what it’s worth.
Firstly to Ian, in all seriousness I don’t think you are reading from the same book as I am – maybe we just have a very different interpretation of the same scriptures. Your version of Scripture however, sounds very much like something derived from the Wonderful World of Disney; looks good, sounds good, a crowd-pleaser, warms the cockles of your heart, but is nothing more than make-believe. We are just going to have to agree to disagree – a cop-out I know, but I can’t see there is any other way to ‘resolve’ our differences. I, for one, have better things to do than continue to fuel your ego. I have already invested way too much of my valuable time wading through this cesspool – time I could have better spent watching paint dry.
To outaegypt, if Ian was actually my “brother” in the Spirit, you would be justified in sending me a warning from Matthew 5:22. I thank you for this message anyway. A pertinent reminder that we all need pay attention to during those times when we feel ourselves getting a little hot under the collar (passionate) about things. I have taken this on board and will take care in future. Perhaps your friend Ian could also take heed of this message – I don’t think referring to someone as “swine” is any better than calling them a fool, do you?
For those of you who have happened upon this website looking for the Truth; turn back, go and look into His Word for yourself, seeking the Lord’s guidance along the way. Don’t take another man’s interpretation of the scriptures as ’gospel’. The Lord knows your heart and if you truly seek the Truth, he will reveal it to you. If you seek salvation, ask the Lord for it and you will receive. How will you know that you have received? Well, that’s the ‘million dollar’ question – whilst I know the answer to that question, let’s just say the Lord will answer that for you Himself with signs following. All I will say is that what you receive you will not be able to deny!
Allow me to refer to a very small but powerful passage written in Paul’s letter to the Phillipians (Chapter 4:8 - NIV):
Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable – if anything is excellent or praise worthy – think about such things.
It’s a shame there is precious little of these praise-worthy characteristics to be found in this website.
A warning for all those visiting this website, I refer to 2 Peter 2:1-3 (NIV),
But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them – bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping...
And for those on this website who shall remain nameless, a scripture for you to consider whether this applies to you: 2 Peter chapter 2 continues... (verses 12 – 14)
... But these people blaspheme in matters they do not understand. They are like unreasoning animals, creatures of instinct, born only to be caught and destroyed, and like animals they too will perish. They will be paid back with harm for the harm they have done. Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, revelling in their pleasures while they feast with you. With eyes full of adultery, they never stop sinning; they seduce the unstable; they are experts in greed – an accursed brood!
Food for thought perhaps? Anyway, as I said, I have wasted too much time as it is with you people. My work is done here. I bid thee farewell.
Blessings, (wink, wink)
ClearVision
|
|
Didaktikon
|
69#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To ClearVision
(Date Posted:22/10/2008 00:43:45)
Well, well.
Sadly, "CV", it's not particularly rare that I witness such a profound degree of ignorance concerning the contents of the Bible; neither is it rare to find Revivalists such as yourself "talking up a storm", but failing to produce anything of substance. Nowadays I simply take it for granted 
You know as well as I that if the discussion turned to Scripture, to exposing its meaning in a lock-step fashion, laying it bare for all to see and judge, that you'd be "outed" for what you are in a heartbeat. And it's for this reason, and no other, that you avoid engaging me as you would the plague. Instead you engage in that which you learned so well: ignorantly dismissing anything that doesn't revolve around your misguided and simplistic beliefs about "tongues" 
You, my deluded friend, are a Revivalist par excellance. I'm even betting that you were "Oversight" too
Hoo, roo.
Ian
(Message edited by Didaktikon On 22/10/2008 01:00:28)
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
|
Talmid
|
70#
|
Rank:Regular Member

Score:4190
Posts:205
Registered:21/04/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:22/10/2008 02:04:56)
Yo CV
Just on the off-chance that you might be curious about responses to your post ...
In a nutshell, IMO, you've plied us with platitudes and regaled us with irrationality. You've accused Ian of teaching false doctrine, yet refused to take the opportunity to specify what it is you take umbrage to, 'though I'm guessing it's that you think speaking in tongues is a sign that universally accompanies receiving the Spirit. Similarly, you've refused to demonstrate that any of the doctrine in Ian's posts is non-Scriptural.
I refused to directly engage the points made by Ian for around 6 years. I hope you don't wait that long.
-------------------------------------------------------------- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
MothandRust
|
71#
|
Rank:Ghost in the machine

Score:34610
Posts:1585
Registered:27/02/2004
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:22/10/2008 02:28:50)
What an anti-climax! And here I was thinking that someone with a bit of 'wit' about them (unlike GWM) was going to put their Revival doctrine to a bit of old time bible scrutiny to see if it floated. Pity he doesn't have time for that... obviously he usually charges by the hour.
The sad part is that he seems one of those types that actually had the 'balls' to leave the Revival circle of churches,(maybe because he's sharp enough to see it as the cold controlling organisation it is, or whatever) but then get stuck in a frustrated rut because they're so indoctrinated with Lloyd's doctrine to actually see the simplicity in the mainstream Christianity that has been rolling on before, during and after their 'Revival'.
(Message edited by MothandRust On 22/10/2008 02:38:21)
-------------------------------------------------------------- Be nice, for everyone that you meet is fighting a harder battle - Anita Roddick
|
|
fordka
|
72#
|
Registered:15/01/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:22/10/2008 06:52:16)
This will show you blokes that RCI are not the only ones that preach Acts 2 38 salvation doctrine, RCI dosent have the monopoly on this. I think there needs to be another area on this forumn set up for Folk wanting to leave rci and needing help without coping interigation on their personal beliefs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MD2jpfDgrdQ&feature=email
|
|
Aimoo Team
|
|
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:22/10/2008 12:45:43)
This message has been deleted due to Termination of Account.
|
|
Didaktikon
|
74#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To fordka
(Date Posted:22/10/2008 16:04:29)
Good morning, Fordka.
There are two points to consider with respect to what you've suggested. First, what the Revivalists preach isn't, in fact, what Acts 2:38 actually states. Consequently, their's isn't an "Acts 2:38 salvation message" at all. Properly speaking, what the Revivalists propose is an aberration of Peter's summary to the Jews at Pentecost. Second, you are perfectly correct in stating that Revivalists aren't the only ones to preach the "repent, be baptised and speak-in-'tongues'" nonsense. The United Pentecostal Church beat Llongfield to this "punch" by about 20 years! There are also a myriad of groups similarly as small as the three, principle Revivalist fellowships. However, what all of these groups have in a common is a "message" that never, at any time, existed in the history of the world (never mind the Christian Church) prior to about 1930! In other words, it's rubbish! 
Revivalists do need to have their beliefs "interrogated" (as you put matters). They do need to be confronted with the fact that not only is what they believe thoroughly unbiblical, it's also thoroughly novel. In short, Revivalists need to be confronted with the truth. What they don't need; however, is to be falsely led into thinking that what they've always accepted is "fact". That they can simply move from one doctrinally dysfunctional group into another.
Revivalists need to be directly, intentionally and unambiguously confronted with their heresy, and given the opportunity to recant of it, and repent from it.
Then, and only then, can they approach Christ so as to be saved
Blessings,
Ian
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
|
misterkilometres
|
75#
|
Rank:Regular Poster

Score:3100
Posts:128
Registered:11/06/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:22/10/2008 16:22:40)
Reply to fordka This will show you blokes that RCI are not the only
ones that preach Acts 2 38 salvation doctrine, RCI dosent have the
monopoly on this. I think there needs to be another area on this forumn
set up for Folk wanting to leave rci and needing help without coping
interigation on their personal beliefs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MD2jpfDgrdQ&feature=email-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmmm. Acts 2 38 salvation doctrine? Also known as a message. But ultimately we are talking GOSPEL aren't we? There seems to be 2 gospels here. The mainstream orthodox gospel, and "Acts 2:38" gospel. They are clearly not the same thing. One of them is the true gospel, and the other is a false one. So before we go to interpreting the bible from Hebrew and Greek, with all the training needed to do this correctly, let us get the gospel right to start with. It is the gospel that is simple to share with others, and unfolding the scriptures to be done with study. So - if your gospel isn't correct, then any unfolding of scripture is going to be just as incorrect as it will be based on the incorrect gospel. So - What is your gospel?
-------------------------------------------------------------- “Preach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words.”
|
|
fordka
|
76#
|
Registered:15/01/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:23/10/2008 00:10:41)
“The United Pentecostal Church beat Llongfield to this "punch" by about 20 years!”
Excellent Ian, thanks for that Ill look them up, I also hear the AOGs believe that to live a good and holy life that you should receive the Holy Spirit, with the initial evidence that you will speak in tongues. and get Baptised by full emersion, So Ill look them up as well
Excellent guidance brothers Job well done (nice try Mr K) :)
|
|
Talmid
|
77#
|
Rank:Regular Member

Score:4190
Posts:205
Registered:21/04/2008
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:23/10/2008 00:51:09)
Hi fordka
You're naiivity is showing :-(
The UPC and fellow oneness pentecostals split from the AOG's b/c of fundamental differences over their views re s.i.t. amongst various other matters. So, just how will you decide which is for you?
Personally, I'd recommend the apostles' doctrine as preserved in Scripture. Now if that *does* guide your thoughts, you'd be well advised to "interigate" whether *either* of those groups understands s.i.t. in the same way as the apostles did.
Of course if you fancy yourself as a snake-handler the choice is clear ...
-------------------------------------------------------------- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
Didaktikon
|
78#
|
Rank:Old Forum Fogey

Score:31600
Posts:1517
Registered:29/08/2007
|
Reply To fordka
(Date Posted:23/10/2008 01:05:47)
Hi, Fordka.
I think you need to re-read my response, specifically my comments regarding the UPC. It wasn't a recommendation (I sort of have this "private" rule about not recommending heresy) 
Blessings,
Ian
(Message edited by Didaktikon On 23/10/2008 05:23:27)
-------------------------------------------------------------- Vivos voco, mortuos plango
website: www.pleaseconsider.info email: didaktikon@gmail.com
|
outaegypt
|
79#
|
Rank:Poster Venti I

Score:6410
Posts:304
Registered:22/06/2006
|
Reply To ClearVision
(Date Posted:25/10/2008 22:59:45)
(Message edited by outaegypt On 25/10/2008 23:02:44)
-------------------------------------------------------------- As I hear it, I'll repeat it,
Its up to you if you believe it!
Allegation big and small,
soon revealed before us all.
outa here- Outa Egypt!
|
outaegypt
|
80#
|
Rank:Poster Venti I

Score:6410
Posts:304
Registered:22/06/2006
|
Reply To ClearVision
(Date Posted:25/10/2008 23:00:15)
Reply to ClearVision if Ian was actually my “brother” in the Spirit, you would be justified in sending me a warning from Matthew 5:22. Perhaps your friend Ian could also take heed of this message – I don’t think referring to someone as “swine” is any better than calling them a fool, do you? Anyway, as I said, I have wasted too much time as it is with you people. My work is done here. I bid thee farewell.
Blessings, (wink, wink)
ClearVision
I wasn't going to bother to respond.....how ever...... Once some bodies attitude has set to nasty, words are of little use. And as you say you've wasted enough time and sent your parting farwells. Your judgmental arrogance of thinking you have made valid points will bring you back- they always come back-even if just for a secret peek!!
I wasn't actually defending 'my Friend Ian', I don't know him therefore I'm not willing to judge him unlike yourself. The point was directed at your attitude and willingness to chance being BBQed just to indulge yourself of a dummy spit.  I suppose the biggest difference between 'swine' and 'fool' is scripture, (small thing- I know) although from your comment obviously the weight of scripture is optional, interchangeable and an idle threat to be ignored unless of course it serves your purpose at the time. Fair thee well....... Not that you will return to read any response of course! 
-------------------------------------------------------------- As I hear it, I'll repeat it,
Its up to you if you believe it!
Allegation big and small,
soon revealed before us all.
outa here- Outa Egypt!
|
|
yas
|
81#
|
Registered:14/12/2008
|
Re:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:15/12/2008 08:02:47)
Reply to Episkopeo (29/06/2008 22:28:14)
I think when one guides themselves there is no longer need for guidelines.
Reply to Sir-Loin,
I think the RCI world leader, deputy world leader and other pastors are having trouble guiding themselves. They flew in the face of their own guidelines with the recent Duker affair.
Episkopeo |
and all the people said: amen!
|
|
D-T-M
|
82#
|
Rank:Rookier II

Score:1830
Posts:75
Registered:28/08/2006
|
RE:A message for Simon Longfield
(Date Posted:19/03/2009 15:54:58)
Simon
The Duker situation is not going to go away.
maybe you could get him to give his "testimony" on Sunday saying that he used to be a big bad property developer and he lost a lot of other people's money including a large number of RCI members but now he has been "saved" and is truly repentant and it won't happen again blah blah blah.
I am sure that you and your fellow pastors, all highly intelligent men, will be able to rationalise the small matter of he allegedly being saved during the time he was implementing his poor investment decisions.
Maybe his baptism was invalid because he may not have been fully immersed or whatever.
I am sure that you get the idea.
Mole
|
|
|