Reply To brolga
(Date Posted:01/05/2008 16:34:31)
Brolga My initial reaction to your signature, George G Smith etc, was more to the defence of the Gospel than to you personally, though one that aligns themselves with such should expect a reaction whether was the nature of the said question or not. Oh really? Goodness me!? I had no idea...meaning no preconceived idea that people would feel a need to defend the 'gospel' - a certain biblical stance / interpretation. There are a lot of non believers in this world so NO definitely NOt....I didn't expect any such thing I sometimes forget that some 'believers' can be intolerant of other world views - including other 'religious' view points. I don't feel the need to 'defend' anything so no I don't take it personally.
That is why as "Guest" (forgot to log in) I put 'WRONG' and couldn't take the comment any further as I had not looked into the "doings" of the Author at the time. Oh okay..?
However I expected a comment or two from others on the matter and I couldn't have expressed it any better. I try not make a practice ducking for cover behind others that have more knowledge in matters and is part of reason I have undertaken a course in theology. Really...I guess you were one expecting a similar reaction. ? That's your 'truth' I guess?  As far as your inquiry goes, my situation, GRC etc., has been fairly well shown in past posts and wouldn't bore you with same details now, except to say it was mainly to do with the false doctrine and teaching I finally got out of Revival. Most of the rest was result of my own human frailty. I still have family members attending and even if for their sakes and if I was able to, I wouldn't go back because I would be doing them a great injustice hiding the truth as I see it now and keeping them in bondage. Yes..I guess many people leave behind family and friends - its so sad -the whole 'intolerance' thing Why do the revivalist practise this extreme kind of intolerate to different 'beliefs'? Rhetorical question...thinking out loud....
Ps. competely understand you not wanting to answer / go over old ground.
(Message edited by snakechic On 01/05/2008 16:36:46)
--------------------------------------------------------------
In exchange for obedience, Christianity promises salvation in an afterlife; but in order to elicit obedience through this promise, Christianity must convince people that they need salvation, that there is something to be saved from. Christianity has nothing to offer a happy person living in a natural, intelligible universe. If Christianity is to gain a motivational foothold, it must declare war on earthly pleasure and happiness, and this, historically, has been its precise course of action. In the eyes of Christianity, woman(man) is sinful and helpless in the face of God, and is potential fuel for the flames of hell. Just as Christianity must destroy reason before it can introduce faith, so it must destroy happiness before it can introduce salvation.
-- George H Smith, Atheism: The Case Against God
|